...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
The Levant an Extension of Africa/Sons of Ham
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [qb] [b] So should the people of Ugarit be regarded as Africans? It seems that if they began in 6-6,500 BC then in order to be regarded as Africans they would have had to have been migrants from Africa right before that and not have deeper roots in the region[/b] There is a time period at which people leave Africa and settle in places outside Africa that they adapt to new conditions and become considered non-Africans So it depends how far outside of Africa you still want to call part of Africa and for what reason Another point of view is that "Africa" and "non Africans" are useless terms all people in theory come from Africa and are therefore Africans. There could be a future time when people are differentiated by genetic markers in way disregarding geography. [/qb][/QUOTE]It depends on the period when identifying people in Syria as African. Naturally 8000ya the people were probably Anu, and related to the Natufians.And as you know they also came from Africa. The Ugarits after 2000 were mainly Africans who had migrated to the area recently, to replace the Anu people who went into decline after the great flood. . [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3