...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
SHAKKA AMHOSE: Was Egyptian Belief Dogmatic? + Chistian/Judeo Reality of Islam
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Fourty2Tribes: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by sam p: I don't understand why race, religion, and politics have to even get into this but it seems quite unavoidable. People have their own neat packages of beliefs and don't like evidence that doesn't agree. Indeed, they usually can't even see evidence unless it agrees. [/QUOTE]I cant even see it. I just know that when the rumor of King Tut being related to Europeans was released it made Television news. When the actual DNA results came in it was as quiet as the Sphinx. If the Dogon were a slavic tribe their connection with Egypt would be in the history books by now. [QUOTE] Right. I don't believe they thought there was really life after death until 2000 BC when the language changed. They recognized a sort of "quasi-life" after death but it was largely just that they thought you weren't really dead until no one remembered you any longer. If a king were "unjustified" at his death they tried to hurry to get people to forget his existence by erasing him from history. If you died with a heavy heart then you did more harm than good and if your heart weighed less than a feather thn you were deceitful, putting on airs, and insubstantial. For the kings their hearts were phyically "weighed" in the Bull of Heaven operated by maat against a feather. If the scale tipped in either direction the king was not justified and his heart was tossed to the ground where it was consumed by plants and animals around the pyramid. The pyramid was the king himself after he was justified and then transmorgrified. But the average man and the scientist/ priests wouldn't have considered him literally "alive" in this or any realm. He still existed only on earth and only as the pyramid and in the memories of people. His name lived on in the annals. When the language died around 2000 BC it died everywhere (except in academia) and science was soon lost as was human history. Even the scientist/ priests couldn't continue using the ancient language for long since it continued to get even more complicated. It's possible that these scientists became known as "nephilim" but this is speculative with very little evidence to support it. In any case it's doubtful anyone could use the ancient language for very long after the world changed. Since it couldn't be translated there was very little ability to preserve anything and since it couldn't be translated the ancient books were allowed to be lost. [/QB][/QUOTE]How do you know the Pyramids were built for a King? Just personal theory I see a possible correlation of Rob Bryanton's theory of life after death and the 42 Declarations of Innocence. Bryanton suggest that after death we are in a world that only exist through our projection or definition of it. The Declarations of Innocence and the spells in the Book of the Dead could just be a culture's way of easing their spirit to better project something endearing and worthy of an afterlife. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3