...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
They made Tut white again
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Gor: [qb] [QUOTE]CHANGE IN THE ETHNIC COMPOSITION OF MODERN EGYPT: We all know in terms of ethnic composition, modern Egypt, is much different from Ancient Egypt. Contemporary Egypt, is mostly an ethnic admixture between foreign invaders and conquerors and indigenous African people. Autosomally, as a whole, they tend to cluster more with Eurasian especially the Middle East. In the south, populations like Nubians probably cluster more with Africans. All this is because of massive immigration from Europe and western Asia which started already in dynastic time, culminating in the Hyksos (Aamu) foreign rule during the second intermediate period, as well as during the late periods up to now (Assyrians, Greeks, Romans, Macedonians, Arab conquest, British colonization, etc).[/QUOTE]Yes, and King Tut falls within this larger scale immigration/invasion period, so too does Ramesses the Great, who was reddish haired. So why is it 'white supremacy' to claim these individuals may have had non-African ancestry? [/qb][/QUOTE]The Hyksos took over part of Egypt around 1640 B.C. for about 100 years. Tutankhamun's reign started 400 years later 1332 BC but prior to the late period invasions beginning much later with the Assyrians in 671 BC. Therefore those later nvasions are irrelevant to Tutankhmun There is no historical evidence Tutankhamun was of Hyksos descent or partial Hyksos descent. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3