...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
They made Tut white again
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] @Gor, Blessedbyhorus and the forum Upon looking at the documents again, the authors (Harris and Wente) either employ a definition of cranial index I've never heard of, [URL=http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z360/Zoobalac/X-RayAtlasofRoyalMummies4.jpg?t=1307079502]or the definition they provide[/URL] suffers from a typo. Not sure which, but until the CIs I listed can be shown to be reproducible, I'm viewing all New Kingdom CI data as suspect, including Hawass'. The reports are all over the place: [QUOTE]The most heterogeneous grouping was that of the XVIII dynasty. [b]What all of these mummies have in common is a tong head or cranium (dolichocephalic)[/b] and a relatively delicate face, compared with the mummies of the XIX and XX dynasties and Old Kingdom mummies that our group has examined.[/QUOTE][URL=http://wysinger.homestead.com/harris_-_1991.pdf]Harris 1991 and Hussein[/URL] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3