...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
They made Tut white again
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Gor: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by tropicals redacted: [qb] @cass How do you reconcile this: [QUOTE] Tut had a CI of 83.9 (Hawass et al. 2010). We also know this bachycephaly was not pathological. [/QUOTE]And this: [QUOTE] If a skull is brachycephalic it is highly unlikely (unless it is pathological) to infer Sub-Saharan African ancestry. [/QUOTE]With this?: [QUOTE] the skull overall, including aspects of the face spoke fairly strongly of his African origins [/QUOTE][/qb][/QUOTE]Hawass et al. 2010 claim it is not pathological, a 2012 study i posted claims it is. Having reviewed the evidence, I would say it is. Tut's head looks deformed with pathologies. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3