...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
MODERN EGYPTIANS on average are mostly of FOREIGN ANCESTRY ???
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by LEDAMA: [QB] I will just repost it here but remove my email. just saw your interview with Dr Sambu today on YouTube,WHAT A HUMBLE MAN..I was really impressed.I have personally never met him in person but I want to.please hook me up..I am working on ancient Egyptian transliteration system based on proto-kalenjin instead of Coptic as the ones used by modern egyptologists.proto-kalenjin is closer to ancient Egyptian than both boharic and sahidic Coptic.Take away Phoenician,Hebrew and classical Greek from Coptic,you are left with with demotic Egyptian which is mostly proto-kalenjin.To get proto-kalenjin I will have to sample all the kalenjin dialects I.e kipsigis,nandi,tugen,pokot,marakwet,sebei.Asar whenever u wanna come to Africa to do a linguistic research,I will be ur host.Kenya is a good place to start,3 language groups of Africa out of 4 are found in Kenya alone ;1) afro-asiatic cushitic(somalis,borana/oromo), also many semitic speaking Ethiopians are found in Nairobi and Mombasa.2)Nilo-Saharan maasai,luo,redo,turkana and samburu.3)Bantu,over 30 tribes,largest being Kikuyu and Luhya.Kenya is a linguistic paradise a most unique African country.In case you decide to come know that my house is your house,I will be your host.thanks [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3