...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Modern North Africans' recent origin is outside Africa
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Troll Patrol # Ish Gebor: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: [qb] As other people have noted, the European academic community is no different today than it was 200 years ago. It was founded on race and racism and is hell bent on trying to prove that "superior" European white folks are the founders of all civilizations OUTSIDE of Europe because that then gives them the claim of "masters of the world" so they can do whatever the hell they want. They have always been trying to come up with some way to introduce themselves into other people's history while not focusing on their own. Where are all the genetic studies of Northwest European DNA? Why isn't there an obsession with that history? Oh, I forgot, there isn't much there to study. And as part of this scheme they created "race science" as a way for Europeans to own and control the way humans were classified according to their "racial" subgroups. However, that scheme fell flat on its face, especially when it comes to 19th century theories like the "dynastic race" theory, which may as well be called the "superior white race theory". Not only was it logically invalid but the facts on the ground did not support it. So now they have a new strategy, which is still the same as the old strategy, but more subtle. Instead of overtly identifying people by "race" directly, now they will use genetics as a replacement for race but to serve the same purpose. Which is why they focus exclusively on coastal north Africa because that population has the metric that they care about: Eurasian mixture. And what they want to do is to say that Eurasians got to North Africa before the Africans did, in a weird backwards round about way. In other words, yeah, the black Africans were there first but sometime in the past they were replaced by Eurasian gene lines. They don't say when this happened. They don't have any ancient remains to prove when, where and how extensive this was, it is all based purely on conjecture. Then they use the fact that Eurasian admixture has dominated the history of coastal North Africa for the last 2000 years as a cover to claim that this was Always the case across all of North Africa. Using genetic markers, they can claim all North Africa was "Eurasian white" without using race labels but effectively accomplishing the same objective. And you know it is B.S. because as others have said they won't use any population in the more Southern areas of any North African countries as part of their genetic sampling. But that will not stop them from claiming these black folks, ancient and modern as part of ancient "Eurasian white" back migrants. But actually this is good because it still backfires against them. They themselves acknowledge that the populations today in North Africa are not the ancient populations. No matter how much they try and obfuscate and smudge the data, the facts are clear that modern North Africa is the result of heavy mixture with Eurasian migrants, especially in the coastal regions of the North. And if these people are not related to the Neolithic populations then that proves the point that these are not ancient "indigenous" African populations. Secondly, it also proves that these people (those representative so called Eurasian back migrants from coastal North Africa) have nothing to do with the ancient populations who existed during the green phase of the Southern Sahara and Nile Valley as these people were blatantly from inner Africa and were "indigenous". So no matter how they try and spin it, these people are not the same and not related to the ancient ones. Now to reinforce this, they SHOULD be doing DNA samples of the blacks in the Southern regions of these countries to understand which population has been in place longer and how extensive and ancient was this "Eurasian white" admixture. But they wont. [/qb][/QUOTE]In fact what they are trying to say is that cacadoids, a word which as was used until early this century, and was replaced by the word Eurasians, have been all over the globe. And that everybody in Africa, who doesn't look stereotypical negroe has Eurasian hum cacasoid admixture. Since they penetrated Africa 40Kya and everytime in between, routinely, until this very day. I recently encountered in to someone on YouTube, some Italian who vividly believes this. And gathers his info from the weirdest places. Wikipedia, "bio forum", YouTube videos etc. From what we can read it is clear there a two apposing camps. Or maybe three. With the last camp being unsure. Gives some but takes back as well. All-in-all, I do see the narcissism you refer at. [/qb][/QUOTE]That isn't narcissism it is just lying. There is no ancient Northern or Western European high civilization they can point at from 5,000 years ago and claim so they have to go all over the world and steal everyone else's history in order to feel good about themselves. And it just isn't feeling good about themselves, it is feeling good about STEALING from everybody else and being able to kick everyone elses behinds so bad that they are either: dead (genocide), near dead (partial genocide/assimilation), slaves (dependent on them for everything) or brainwashed wannabees who admire and uphold everything they do and emulate it and want to be part of it. And stealing the history, putting themselves into it and using that to reinforce the fact that they are the billy bad ass on the block is the whole point. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3