...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
They have Hannibal Barca as black again and Eurocentrics are mad again
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BlessedbyHorus: [QB] @Ish Geber The argument is NOT with [b]indigenous[/b] Northwest Africans/Berbers, who we(hell most Euronuts sometimes admit) all know were indigenous Africans and black especially according to classical writers and especially during the medieval period. But with Hannibal Barca who is said to be of Phoenician descent, which is what most of these Eurocentrics are claiming and thus they claim we can't argue if Hannibal was black. But there are historians who argue that Hannibal was black. French historian Gabriel Audisio said in 1961: "I consider Hannibal to be neither a Phoenician, nor a Carthaginian, nor a Punic, but a North African". Gilbert Picard wrote: "The majority of the (Carthaginian) populace seems to have had African, indeed Negroid, ancestry". Audisio continued to explain why they were Black: "The Carthaginians, colonizers of North Africa, in contrast to today's colonizers of Algeria, were not averse to mixed marriage. The historians agree that this was accepted social custom among the aristocracy as well as the middle & lower classes. One is, then, in no way hindered in saying that Hannibal was part of this majority of African ancestry". Source: https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1368&dat=19660711&id=HHhQAAAAIBAJ&sjid=VBEEAAAAIBAJ&pg=4819,2265161&hl=en So the argument of Hannibal's race/ethnicity is NOT as one sided as these Euronuts want it to be... [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3