...
EgyptSearch Forums Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» EgyptSearch Forums » Egyptology » Archaeology and Languages in Prehistoric Northern Eurasia » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
Ish Gebor
Member # 18264
 - posted
quote:
The population of AMH spreading in the eastern direction included “softened” Mongoloid elements. The “dialectal continuum” consisting of Proto-Uralic, Proto-Altaic and Palaeo-Siberian- related languages formed the principal communication media of Early Modern Humans in northern Eurasia.
--Pavel M. DOLUKHANOV

Japan Review, 2003, 15:175-186
Archaeology and Languages in Prehistoric Northern Eurasia

School of Historical Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

http://shinku.nichibun.ac.jp/jpub/pdf/jr/IJ1507.pdf
 
Ish Gebor
Member # 18264
 - posted
quote:
Europeans carry a motley mix of genes from at least three ancient sources: indigenous hunter-gatherers within Europe, people from the Middle East, and northwest Asians from near the Great Steppe of eastern Europe and central Asia. One high-profile recent study suggested that each genetic component entered Europe by way of a separate migration and that they only came together in most Europeans in the past 5000 years. Now ancient DNA from the fossilized skeleton of a short, dark-skinned, dark-eyed man who lived at least 36,000 years ago along the Middle Don River in Russia presents a different view: This young man had DNA from all three of those migratory groups and so was already “pure European,” says evolutionary biologist Eske Willerslev of the Natural History Museum of Denmark at the University of Copenhagen, who led the analysis.


http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/11/european-genetic-identity-may-stretch-back-36000-years
 
the lioness,
Member # 17353
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by Ish Gebor:
Nobody was mentioning "oid", until you popped up. [/QB]


 
Clyde Winters
Member # 10129
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by Ish Gebor:
quote:
Europeans carry a motley mix of genes from at least three ancient sources: indigenous hunter-gatherers within Europe, people from the Middle East, and northwest Asians from near the Great Steppe of eastern Europe and central Asia. One high-profile recent study suggested that each genetic component entered Europe by way of a separate migration and that they only came together in most Europeans in the past 5000 years. Now ancient DNA from the fossilized skeleton of a short, dark-skinned, dark-eyed man who lived at least 36,000 years ago along the Middle Don River in Russia presents a different view: This young man had DNA from all three of those migratory groups and so was already “pure European,” says evolutionary biologist Eske Willerslev of the Natural History Museum of Denmark at the University of Copenhagen, who led the analysis.


http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/11/european-genetic-identity-may-stretch-back-36000-years
 -

.

Interesting....
.
 
Ish Gebor
Member # 18264
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:
Originally posted by Ish Gebor:
Nobody was mentioning "oid", until you popped up.


It's a relatively "old paper" thus such language. But the data itself is still relevant. LOL You lose again. LOL
 
the lioness,
Member # 17353
 - posted
fool 2003 is not that old, plus the term "mongoloid' is still used in current anthropology . There are tons of current articles using the term, fool
 
Ish Gebor
Member # 18264
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by the lioness,:
fool 2003 is not that old, plus the term "mongoloid' is still used in current anthropology . There are tons of current articles using the term, fool

It's old enough, to say that it's old for such usage, FOOL. LOL


The suffix "oid" is considered outdated.
 



Contact Us | EgyptSearch!

(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3