...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Chad Genetic Diversity : Multiple Eurasian Migrations 2016
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: [QB] Posting this again. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: [qb] Here is the key question that people need to be asking and I know this has been discussed here before but it needs to be reiterated. How come African genes outside Africa are quickly labeled as something other than African because of splits, yet so-called Eurasian genes in Africa are Eurasian even thousands of years later and after multiple splits? See the pattern here? Multiple papers in a short time period talking of ancient "Eurasian" lineages in Africa, yet Africa is the BASIS of all humans on the planet and there are HARDLY ANY papers on African lineages in Europe, the Levant, Asia and elsewhere. Sounds like a double standard to me. The following wiki page shows how arbitrary and contradictory the logic goes regarding labeling African genetics versus Eurasian genetics. By the logic they use to label "Eurasian" mixture in Africa, ALL HUMANS outside of Africa and their lineages should be labeled as African for the first 10,000 years of human existence outside of Africa. But note that they don't do this.... Wonder why? Keep in mind that Neanderthal admixture is one scam they use to justify this nonsense..... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_admixture_in_Europe [/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3