...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Is this author on to something?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] Yes, he might have gems on other topics, but I've never seen him say anything useful about Africans when it comes to common Eurocentric tropes. He always panders to his armchair anthro audience. They all say non sense like this: [QUOTE]So what about the Sardinian admixture from Africans? The same dynamic might be at play here: [b]old admixture from “Early European Farmers” into Africans might explain why they’re closer to Africans.[/b][/QUOTE]But what does that even mean? Llorente et al 2015's [URL=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26912899]wild claims have been corrected by the authors[/URL] and these pinheads are still gloating over "massive Eurasian ancestry" in Sub-Saharan Africa that "pulls southern Europeans to Africans". Where is this "massive farmer input" that they keep talking about? Notice how he tries to emphasize that the farmer ancestry he's talking about is "old". That's often their excuse why they can't post anything official: the farmer ancestry deep inside Sub-Saharan Africa is supposedly "old" and somehow requires "special equipment" to detect. This is simply pseudo science. This claim cannot be disproved because it's not falsifiable. It's deliberately not falsifiable. That's how they protect their worldview of not being a hybrid population. ANI is also partly Basal Eurasian so you can see how certain positions Razib takes are driven by denial. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3