...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Because some fools don't know how to make their own thread about the race of kemet
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by JoshuaConnerMoon: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Ish Gebor: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by JoshuaConnerMoon: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by sudaniya: [qb] And the pretense of objectivity is completely shattered. The troll desperately tries [and fails] to carefully construct arguments that afford him the flexibility to perform mental gymnastics he requires to undermine the simply unassailable fact that AE was created by black people in Upper and Lower Egypt; it's only in later periods that perhaps Lower Egypt became admixed... which would only make them biracial -- and I have yet to see biracial people (such as Obama) being referred to as white by Western Europeans. Europeans are completely uncomfortable with the very notion of acknowledging the fact that the world's first advanced and incredibly influential civilization was a product of Northeast African blacks; this discomfort is a derivative of the fact that ancient Greece -the ostensible spring of "Western" civilization would not have been able to attain a fraction of its achievements were it not for its extensive contacts with Egypt. The civilization of Crete was Europe's first civilization and it owed a great deal of its ascendancy to its relations with Egypt; Crete was a recipient of a plethora of great gifts from Egypt... namely the ability to read and write. The art and architecture of Crete was also clearly heavily influenced by Egypt. The Hellenes [mycenaeans] then received these gifts but lost it shortly thereafter - ushering in what is commonly known as the Greek dark ages. The Greeks again rediscovered literacy through contact with the Phoenicians -- a polity that itself learned this from Egypt. Northwest Europeans only accessed the keys to civilization when barbarian Germanic tribes overan Rome a little over a thousand years ago and exploited the wealth of material knowledge that Rome acquired through its conquest of the very Greece that itself acquired such wealth primarily from Egypt, and to a lesser extent the Levant and Mesopotamia. The Romans conquered the source of excellence in the ancient world by conquering Egypt themselves. Ancient Egypt was an advanced civilization thousands of years before it introduced the ancient Greeks to Science, Mathematics, architecture, Medecine and even philosophy. The fact that ancient Egypt was the product of Northeast blacks, makes it virtually impossible for Northwest Europeans to assert and maintain the notion that they are inherently superior - which is precisely what they have been asserting for over 500 years. It's too much for the West to admit that they would not be where they are without all that they have absorbed from non-European civilizations, and that a black civilization was the greatest teacher of the ancient Greeks. Everything has been distorted by these people. For example: Imhotep [not Hippocretes] was the true father of medecine. The sooner we Africans overthrow our mis-leaders and traitors... the sooner we can begin to bequeth our children with such knowledge - without so much as a pinch of concern for what Europeans think. [/qb][/QUOTE]Ignoring your usage of "black", I hardly disagree with you recognising AE were "northeast Africans". The point is though those northeast Africans are not sub-Saharan Africans who lacked civilization. This is like the north vs. south divided in Europe, only it is reversed - northern Europeans were primitive in ancient times, while southern Europeans had advanced cultures and civilizations. Those Afrocentrists on this forum arguing for northeast African origin of AE I have little quarrel with. My main problem is those trying to attach sub-Saharan Africans to Egypt. [/qb][/QUOTE]"the point is though those northeast Africans are not sub-Saharan Africans who lacked civilization." There are many different sub-Sahara populations. Try yo see that for once. [/qb][/QUOTE]There's a reason why civilizations (excluding those of East Asia) arose in roughly the same area of the east-Mediterranean - Greece/Egypt/Phoenicia/Babylon etc. (Rome was basically a Greek transplant stemming from the Magna Graecia colonies and Carthaginian civilization was founded by Phoenicians). Can't be bothered to explain it right now though. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3