...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Because some fools don't know how to make their own thread about the race of kemet
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by beyoku: Clyde Winters you are counter intelligence, i have your figured out. Nobody can be that stupid. You are like the Black hebrew Israelite that argues that Enslaved Negroes are not "Africans" even after they are pulling DNA from Slave Graveyards in america and they are grouping with Senegambians and Nigerians. [URL=http://news.psu.edu/story/316054/2014/05/15/research/dating-and-dna-show-paleoamerican-native-american-connection]This is how Negro looking Americans plot in DNA[/URL] [QUOTE] [b]Morphologically, Naia does not look like a contemporary Native American, but mitochondrial DNA testing -- maternally inherited DNA -- carried out by Brian Kemp, Washington State University, and his collaborators shows that she has a D1 haplotype. This is consistent with the hypothesis that her ancestors' origins were in Beringia[/b] , a now partially submerged landmass including parts of Siberia, Alaska and the Yukon. Early humans moved into this area from elsewhere in Asia and remained there for quite some time. During that time they developed a unique haplotype that persists today in Native Americans. [b]Genetically, Paleoamericans have similar attributes as modern Native Americans even if their morphology appears different.[/b] [/QUOTE][URL=http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dna-12000-year-old-skeleton-helps-answer-question-who-were-first-americans-180951469/]OR read this link[/URL] [QUOTE] But therein lies a puzzle: [b]"Modern Native Americans closely resemble people of China, Korea, and Japan… but the oldest American skeletons do not,[/b] " says archaeologist and paleontologist James Chatters, lead author on the study and the owner of Applied Paleoscience, a research consulting service based in Bothell, Washington. [b] The small number of early American specimens discovered so far have smaller and shorter faces and longer and narrower skulls than later Native Americans, more closely resembling the modern people of Africa, Australia, and the South Pacific.[/b] "This has led to speculation that perhaps the first Americans and Native Americans came from different homelands," Chatters continues, "or migrated from Asia at different stages in their evolution." The newly discovered skeleton—named Naia by the divers who discovered her, after the Greek for water—should help to settle this speculation. [b] Though her skull is shaped like those of other early Americans, she shares a DNA sequence with some modern Native Americans. In other words, she’s likely a genetic great-aunt to indigenous people currently found in the Americas.[/b] [/QUOTE]Thats it......"They came before Columbus" is pretty much dead in the water [b] UNTIL they identify recent Africans in the genetic record. [/b] . We start to be on the genetic record about 350 years ago give or take. TRUST ME, I have been watching and WAITING to be surprised by ancient American dna. Aint happened yet, probably wont happen. Here are 92 ancient american skeletons. http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/2/4/e1501385.full MTDNA L, charactersitic of Africa is missing in action from 8600-1500 year ago. [URL=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/dna-ties-8500-year-old-kennewick-man-skeleton-to-native-american-tribes/2016/04/28/9daced86-0d47-11e6-bfa1-4efa856caf2a_story.html?utm_term=.3e4b71248bee]Here is an article on Kennewick man, to the horror of Euroclowns worldwide he is Native Amerian regardless of his so called Caucasoid phenotype[/URL] [URL=http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v523/n7561/full/nature14625.html]Here are the genetic results of Kennewick man[/URL][/QUOTE]Thus this is examplar par excellence of why people shouldn't rely too much on morphology alone for phylogenetic origins of a population. I and others on this forum have been repeating this often not just in regards to Paleo-Amerindians. Mind you the same thing can be said about early populations of East Asia proper (look up the Zhoukoudian and Liujiang AM human crania) or Minatogawa man of Okinawa. "[i]Things don't get clearer for the Cro-Magnons, the presumed ancestors of modern Europeans, many resembled present-day Australian aborigines or sub-Saharan Africans than present Europeans.[/i]" Chris Stringer, African Exodus (2013) But at least in the case of Indigenous Americans and to an extent East Asians there is genetic continuity. What the Castrated Anglo refuses to admit however is that there was [i]not[/i] such continuity in Europe due to the intrusion of Neolithic forebears from the Middle East as well as North Africa proper who carry [b]African[/b] genetic clades. Which is why today [b]one-third[/b] of Europeans carry paternal E-M215 derived clade. The Anglo-idiot can call these Neolithic immigrants "proto-Mediterraneans" all he wants but it won't change their African phylogenetic profile. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3