...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Because some fools don't know how to make their own thread about the race of kemet
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ish Gebor: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Cass/: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Oshun: You and the other Eurocentrics created a regional identity of "Sub Saharan" blacks, but the cultures that made dynastic Egypt were NOT Saharan. For THOUSANDS of years they shared Africa with "Sub Saharans" and there was NO desert you could claim acted as a genetic barrier. The windowspan for the full return of the Sahara came a little before or a little after dynastic Egypt. When the Sahara did fully return AE then had nile which not only supported life but [b]allowed them contact with SSA people.[/b] It's not "Pan African lunacy." You guys are the [b]main ones[/b] dividing Africa by which side of the Sahara people lived. But foundations of AE civilization were from people who were not "Saharan." :rolleyes: [/QUOTE]You're just making stuff up. Look at the map you posted in other thread- [IMG]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-7gIa8rKpUA0/Ttuhyj9K9_I/AAAAAAAAACw/3WWiQagfm6s/s1600/climate+controlled+occupation+of+sahara+in+the+holocene.jpg[/IMG] Zoom: [IMG]http://www.dandebat.dk/images/1584p.jpg[/IMG] Observe most settlement movement is Egyptians moving west (not that far in km) into the desert from the Nile valley and vice-versa back east [i]in Egypt[/i]; there was not some sort of mass exodus into Sub-Saharan Africa and the fewer more distant settlements south of Egypt, such as northern Sudan are still in the Sahara if you check the latitude and desert boundary: [IMG]http://saharafun.weebly.com/uploads/4/5/0/0/45008881/9804989_orig.jpg[/IMG] [/qb][/QUOTE]The culture was based on and surrounding the Nile Valley for obvious reasons, to really understand this, you need to understand the climate and region. You are absolutely clueless on what you talk about. Besides this, as others already have explained: the Sahara was once wed and luscious. A lot of the evidence is buried within the desert. The Napta Playa is evident for this: [IMG]https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/cd/e5/76/cde5763b79fde62ece055d6d9f513ddd.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]https://courseware.e-education.psu.edu/courses/earth105new/graphics/L05_oasis_locations.png[/IMG] As you can see on the map, the oases are located in places where the modern rainfall is clearly insufficient to provide adequate drinking water. So we must be talking about climate change. There was a time when the Sahara was immensely rainy, and now it is not. We care because the development of Egyptian civilization and settlement in the Nile Delta was driven by this climate change. We also care because this huge change in climate was not caused by human activity. https://courseware.e-education.psu.edu/courses/earth105new/content/lesson07/04.html [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3