...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Because some fools don't know how to make their own thread about the race of kemet
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: [QB] [b]I'm the only person proposing a clinal model here. You afroloons cling to an antiquated racialist model like Linnaeus' Homo Africanus. You think there is some African meta-population/pan-African genetic cluster and therefore a discontinuity between the Levant and Egypt. No. And pretty much all bio-anthropologists disagree with you (even Keita if you read him carefully). [/b] Laughable nonsense from the "ANglo/Cass/Thule" buffoon, who has been debunked numerous times and still keeps trying to find some kind of "Caucasoid angle" that can salvage his rubbish. What "clinal model" simpleton? Your "argument from distance" is yet more laughable garbage restated with more verbiage but still garbage. Recycling it in the hopes you have found some "smoking gun" is a miserable failure. You tried the same thing a few weeks back by arguing that the Nile cataracts "hindered" gene flow into Egypt -which is yet another variation on your debunked "argument from distance". But as pointed out back then, Africans do migrate to any part of the continent they want to. They don't conveniently cluster due mainly to "distance." Let's recap your earlier failure. [QUOTE]Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: [qb] [b]The reason is quite simple: the southern frontier/boundary of Egypt at the first cataract of the Nile was the approximate position of the Tropic of Cancer throughout classical antiquity. Sub-Egyptians from the tropics are darker skinned than Egyptians because of their latitude and the Tropic of Cancer was the "yardstick" for who was/isn't black, at least by the Greeks. This also shows in the Old Testament/Jewish texts, Egyptians while a (lighter) shade of brown, are contrasted to the darker black Nubians. [/b] [/b] Simplistic rubbish. Why would the Tropic of Cancer be any kind of "yardstick" of blackness? 3 strikes and you lose again. [b]STRIKE 1[/b] Hard as it is for some Simpletons to grasp, tropical Africans move around the continent at will. They don't stay huddled behind some sort of climatic "apartheid" line. Because they DO move around credible scientists show that the foundational population of Kemet was tropically adapted, and that they came from "sub-Saharan" Africa.. [IMG]http://www.geocities.ws/nilevalleypeoples/raxterrufftrinkhauscombo.jpg[/IMG] [b]STRIKE 2[/b] Even in the north, mainstream scholars find the same tropical adaptations... The arrival of late period populations would cause more variation but it still does not change the bottom line foundations. As Kemp 2005 notes: QUOTE(s): [i]"..sample populations available from northern Egypt from before the 1st Dynasty (Merimda, Maadi and Wadi Digla) turn out to be significantly different from sample populations from early Palestine and Byblos, suggesting a lack of common ancestors over a long time. If there was a south-north cline variation along the Nile valley it did not, from this limited evidence, continue smoothly on into southern Palestine. [b]The limb-length proportions of males from the Egyptian sites group them with Africans rather than with Europeans."[/b] [/i] --(Barry Kemp, "Ancient Egypt Anatomy of a Civilisation. (2005) Routledge. p. 52-60) [IMG]http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/super-villain/images/9/91/3998596-dr-evil.jpg[/IMG] [i]Oooohhh we have to drop everything and stop now- there's the first cataract.. lol [/i] [b]STRIKE 3[/b] The southern border of Egypt at Aswan has been a border in SOME years. But as credible Egyptologists show, Egypt has often controlled land BEYOND that traditional line. In fact some of the most notable archaeological sites in Egypt are found south of Aswan.. Duh.. As if the Egyptians dropped everything and stopped at Aswan.. QUOTE: "This cataract generally marked Egypt's southern boundary, [b]although throughout its history the land that Egypt has controlled has included more southern areas, including parts of what is now Sudan." [/b] --Salima Ikram. 2009. Ancient Egypt: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press (Salima Ikram is Professor of Egyptology at the American University in Cairo.) [b]THAT'S THREE STRIKES.[/b] Shouldn't you be somewhere fulminating bout "taking back our country?" [IMG]http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/strike-three-youre-out.jpeg[/IMG] [/qb][/QUOTE]------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NOW ON TO YOUR OTHER GARBAGE: [b]"Caucasoid" features are not found at high frequency in west sub-Saharan African populations. [/b] Dull buffoon, as already shown by credible scholars, sub-Saharan Africans have the highest phenotypical diversity in the world. Things like narrow noses are not "Caucasian" they are a built-in part of NATIVE African diversity. Pretending that they aren't simply exposes you in yet another lie. [IMG]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-OX7hXrlASZc/U8ataZ3p8TI/AAAAAAAABCM/xxVm4h3JweY/s1600/tropical_african_diversity_nakt.jpg[/IMG] [b]he mantra "Sub-Saharans have the greatest phenotypic variation" Afrocentrists spam on this forum ad nauseam ignores the geographical structure of this variation in Sub-Saharan Africa. [/b] LMAO ignorant dolt. NOthing is "ignored" in a simple statement of the scinetific facts. Sub-Saharan Africans DO have the highest phenotypical diversity, and "geographical structure" such as it is, is irrelevant to this central point. Narrow noses appear in "sub-Saharan" Africa routinely and are nothing special. Since when does "Nigeria" define all Africa? You do not apply the same reasoning to Europe and say that Swedes represent all Europeans, again exposing your hypocrisy. [b]Furthermore, it is not the case that "Caucasoid" features are common across the whole of East Africa, [/b] Features you keep calling "Caucasoid" are not so at all, but are part of built-in African native diversity. All your claims fail on this central point, no matter how you try to "repackage" them. And by the way both Somalians, Ethiopians etc are "sub-Saharan" Africans dufus. [b]Your argument was more advanced culture came primarily from the south not north. But all evidence shows the opposite for the Neolithic period. [/b] Dullard, you are wrong again. It is precisely during the Neolithic which some scholars extend up to 2000BC, that said culture cam from the south. You say "all evidence" But have not produced a single shed of "all" this evidence. What's taking you so long dufus? While we wait on yet another round of bullshiit from you here's some actual data. Note credible scholars show that the Dynastic state emerges around the 3rd millennium BC, and that the impetus was from the south. So tell us ignorant fool, where is "all this evidence" you say that it wasn't so.. Speak up dufus! [IMG]https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-iCxxSZL3ycQ/VjbK46l421I/AAAAAAAAB6o/-VyBd6Y_e3I/s1600/nilevalleytimeline2.jpg[/IMG] [b]Real tawk is African-American, he's a former Black Hebrew Israelite. [/b] LMAO.. SO this is your "go to" black guy? Black "Hebe"-brew.. Oooohhh that's real credible.... [IMG]http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/super-villain/images/9/91/3998596-dr-evil.jpg[/IMG] I have bigger fish to fry, like actual pedophile scumbags, only yesterday who sent me a threat of stalking a child at local primary school near me http://matthewhopkinsnews.com/?p=4820. You know I could have completely destroyed those lives of those afrocentrists here who targeted me? I could have created 1000 blogs, websites, even .coms., then got their doxes and so on. But I didn't. [b]I have bigger fish to fry, like actual pedophile scumbags, only yesterday who sent me a threat of stalking a child at local primary school near me. You know I could have completely destroyed those lives of those afrocentrists here who targeted me? I could have created 1000 blogs, websites, even .coms., then got their doxes and so on. But I didn't. [/b] Lying biotch. YOU yourself have been involved in a war with so-called "Afrocentrists" in the UK where you HAVE been creating multiple sock-puppet accounts, multiple blogs and doxing them. Your own conduct here exposes your lies- from your multiple troll accounts (Thule/Dead/Cass/Moon and dozens of others), to your multiple web blogs and sites such as your bogus "Hamitic Union", to your purported "administration" of Rational wiki etc all expose you. Now you try to pose as this innocent, persecuted babe, "unfairly" harassed by the UK "Afrocentrics"? Dude, you yoself engaged in the dirtiest tricks and smear tactics, and now you whine about "Unfairness" when on the receiving end? Biotch please... [b]Take into consideration when I joined this forum in 2010 I was still a teenager. I've recently just turned 26 [/b] You have lied so much why should anyone beleive your latest claim? ANd 20 years old is an adult not a teenager. DOn't try to use that as an excuse. [b]Perhaps you missed the fact pre-2013 I argued for Hamitism, but post-2013 do not. I now argue ancient Egyptian civilization was indigenous.[/b] No one is fooled by your bogus "disclaimer". You argued for OUTSIDE Hamiticism back then. Now you argue for a "softer" internal Hamiticism without huge visible oncoming flows of mystical "Hamitic" migrants, but your "new" formula isn;t fooling anyone. You still are running your long debunked "Caucasoid" Egypt con game, only now the "Caucasoids" are indigenous. You were forced to change your tune because you and your troll buddies elsewhere were continuously exposed, embarrassed and debunked, so now you have switched labels and tactics, but no one is being fooled. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3