...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Because some fools don't know how to make their own thread about the race of kemet
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: Researchers are constantly changing the names of haplogroups. [/QUOTE]It's called scientific progress. Of course, new genetic discoveries are being made all the time and the nomenclature gets updated to more precision. But what you do is mix and match old and new fragments to create fog for the shell game, your preconceive assumptions that haven't changed since 1972 [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: I am not the only one. Yao et al, and Fucharoen et al, in their discussion of the haplogroup D mutations were the first to illustrate that haplogroup D(4) was in reality M1, until they changed the nomenclature. [/QUOTE]You are lying again Yao or Fucharoen did not say D4 was M1, you do not have not quote of them saying that, you are just name dropping [/qb][/QUOTE]Read the articles. They did not have to say the haplogroups were M1 The description of the shared polymorphic sites within clusters made it clear that subjects in the study were M1 carriers. When the Yao et al, and Fucharoen et al, articles were published the combination of mutations within polymorphic sites were not called haplogroup M1, or D(4). The D(4) designation came later when the "experts" made East Asian M clade into D, and renamed East Asian M1 into D4. This was much the same way researchers renamed African R1, V88. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3