...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Because some fools don't know how to make their own thread about the race of kemet
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Cass/: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Cass/: [qb] [IMG]http://i56.tinypic.com/sbrfrk.png[/IMG] This source (the same you used) has Egyptians, who I presume are an ancient rather than living sample at 84.8 mean crural index (this is almost identical to the 84.9 mean for the pooled-sex ancient Egyptian sample in [URL=Raxter, 2011]http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4500&context=etd[/URL]); Yugoslavs score 83.7. I told you geographical populations between Egypt and Yugoslavia [b]fill in those spaces[/b] on the plot between the Yugoslavians (83.7) and Egyptians (84.8), so for example Raxter's (2011)Mediterranean/South European sample is 83.9. American Blacks score 85.3 and Pygmies 85.1, although Raxter (2011) has the latter on 85.6, but this might be down to the extremely small sample size of only 6 males and 3 females. All I have to do is add more populations between South Europe and Egypt to close some of the distance between 83.9 and 84.8; it can easily be done since Raxter did not include south Levant samples and if those were included they would be more or less equidistant to Egyptians as the American Blacks and Pygmies. Do you get this yet? Note though American Blacks don't closely resemble West Africans in crural index because of their sizable European admixture, for example compare American Blacks to West African means in Raxter (2011), the difference is fairly big, 85.3 vs. 86.2. [/qb][/QUOTE]Last I [URL=http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=006366;p=1]checked[/URL], Raxter chose American blacks because of all Americans they approached Egyptian proportions. The excuse of "European admixture" is pathetic considering that both Pygmies and Melanesians cluster closely with the Egyptian sample as well. In your imaginary Y axis, New Mexican Indians align more closely to Egyptians than even the Yugoslavs but funny how you ignore them altogether as having any genetic ties to the Egyptians based on the same premise. [b]LOL[/b] :D This issue was discussed before as I linked above with you (Thule) debunked already! Get off this forum and take update your meds, psycho. :D [/qb][/QUOTE]LOL. I'm not going over this one again. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3