...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptians DNA is Less Sub Saharan than modern Egyptian DNA.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Elmaestro: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [qb] " It's a fact that these tested mummies are not Sub-Saharan African. Live with it" lol! It is NOT a fact . SMH It is not what you may think it is. We have seen many abstracts like that. But when we get the full paper it is completely different. It is impossible for the AEians to be anything but SSA or North Africans. Keep in mind E1b1b found in the 8000 year old Natufians. Natufians are North Africans with some SSA (NO MORE SSA ANCESTRY). Does not mean “no” SSA ancestry. Remember King Tut was R1b, lol!. Amarna’s carry SSA STRs. Also Rameses III and Man E was E1b1a. Don’t read too much into this abstract until you get the paper. Modern Egyptians are heavily admixed with Turks. These facts cannot change no matter how they try to spin it. [/qb][/QUOTE]It's crazy because I honestly don't see how any of this sh!t matters right now.... Why are we even talking about armanas... Look at the recorded history of AEgypt during the late intermediate period!! ...the concern is the increased SSA affinities and what it entails about the demographic structure during the Roman period... [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3