...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptians DNA is Less Sub Saharan than modern Egyptian DNA.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [IMG]https://i.imgbox.com/MRQrI1lz.png[/IMG] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Cass/: [qb] My argument is based on the standard used by physical anthropologists: black is 29-36. Like you said, give or take a couple of units because these are fuzzy. But we have afronuts on this forum like Doug who think light brown hues as low as 17 are black and they only say this so they can lump much lighter skinned north African populations in with themselves as part of their pan-African politics. No physical anthropologist however does this. [/qb][/QUOTE]You would have to quote Doug to prove he said that [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [qb] @Lioness You're never going to get agreement on this. This is why I've said a long time ago that I'm going to stop using the term without trying to persuade others. Others can use it if they want to. I see the politics and so I'm dropping it. Others here can pretend that only the Eurocentric opposition is doing these spin antics all they want, but parties on both sides are doing it. I love sitting back and pointing out how aDNA is exposing them. Somehow people here think only Europeans have to make adjustments after the discovery that Labrana wasn't white. :rolleyes: [/qb][/QUOTE]The proposal is on the table, you don't know, maybe people will agree. Maybe Doug and Djehuti will agree Black = give or take one unit 27-36 [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3