...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptians DNA is Less Sub Saharan than modern Egyptian DNA.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Cass/: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Cass/: Not interested in anecdotes. "Black" on the Luscan Scale as used by physical anthropologists e.g. Carleton Coon is 29-36. You're trying to move the standard boundary for your own agenda. Show me a single anthropologist who thinks 24 or 25 is black.[/QUOTE]Why are there thousands of artworks depicting many Egyptians as medium to dark brown and why are most of the Pharoahs depicted medium to dark brown? [/qb][/QUOTE]I've been on Stormfront, VNN and the reverse, i.e. black nationalist/Afrocentric forums. All people do from both is cherry pick images off Google - those on Stormfront cherry-pick the lightest they can find, while Afrocentrists just spam the darkest. I'm not interested in going down this route. Me posting the Nefertiti bust was just to falsify the "black Egypt" theory, the fact is I recognise the variation/skin cline in Nile Valley. Note however I've never tried to lump Egyptian pigmentation as "white" - I've stuck to finer categories like light brown / medium brown and dark brown. Only dark brown would be "black". The average Nubian was dark brown, not Egyptian. This is in Snowden, Brace et al etc. Are all those cross-disciplinary classicists and physical anthropologists wrong? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3