...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptians DNA is Less Sub Saharan than modern Egyptian DNA.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by -Just Call Me Jari-: [QB] Yep and its funny because the people who use black as a trojan horse to claim racial links to A. Egypt will use black with an authoritarian sense of pride, demanding that other people use "Black" they same way they use it, when in fact many cultures differ on the use of black. These same people will go into all sorts of paroxysms of rage when Eurocentrics use Negro/negroid again them the same way they used black.... [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by -Just Call Me Jari-: [qb] Yep, this is why I brought up this same issiue back in 2011, now I feel vindicated in my skepticism of the usage of black. http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=004897 [/QUOTE]Kudos. You were already making adjustments as early as 2011. In fact, threads like these prove that most of the serious posters had already decided that, out of the many uses, the purely pigmentation-based use of 'black' is the only one that can be defended. Very few serious mainstream posters used the term 'black' as a synonym for some sort of 'African race'. Maybe some still slipped up every now and then, but there was a general agreement that, ideally, it should be about one's level of pigmentation. In that sense the AE would be 'black' obviously [meaning a range of brown that includes jetblack]. But the problem is that you will always have people slipping in some trojan horse and making it about 'race'. [/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3