...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptians DNA is Less Sub Saharan than modern Egyptian DNA.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by -Just Call Me Jari-: [QB] I was reading an old paper that I downloaded as a PDF a few years back, and in it Keita was saying that Afro-Asiatic probably evolved in the Levant, he was criticizing Ehret so Im guessing if Keita is right then the Levant was important to the development of Ancient Egypt than most posters here would give credit, though I believe most academics put Egypt's founding population squarely in the Green Sahara and the Eastern Desert..I would be really interested in your finds on Egypt's relationship with the Levant. [QUOTE]Originally posted by BlessedbyHorus: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [qb] In terms of Ramses III's TribeScores, the Levant outscores/rivals some SSA regions, though not all. In the case of his son, the Levant outscores only the Sahel. In both cases, the Levant is far above the remaining non-African regions, consistent with known African migration to that area. http://www.dnatribes.com/dnatribes-digest-2013-02-01.pdf [/qb][/QUOTE]Okay, now I see what you are seeing. But I still see Great Lakes and Southern Africa outscoring. HOWEVER... Like we all agreed these results are not to be taken "literally." Since Great Lakes are seen as a better "proxy" for the African origins of Ramesse III I believe. Correct me if I am wrong. [/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3