...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptians DNA is Less Sub Saharan than modern Egyptian DNA.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Elmaestro: [qb] [b]DougM. [/b], I understand that I don't have much rapor on here but if you consider both what Beyoku and I stated you can see the possible "benefit" of this study... It's equally wrong to downplay this as it is to treat it as the end all answer to everything we've questioned. [/qb][/QUOTE]All scholarship has benefit but I don't understand why some folks are running around acting like this is something earth shattering. It is just one piece of a bigger puzzle and one piece isn't the whole puzzle. That is all I am saying. Again, the third intermediate period was a time of turmoil and during this period you also had the rise of the 25th dynasty, the Kushite dynasty. So depending on what mummies you are looking at and what time period you are bound to get different results. Given the fact of turmoil and the various upheavals and invasions that took place is is too simplistic to suggest one overarching narrative for this time period. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3