...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptians DNA is Less Sub Saharan than modern Egyptian DNA.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] Modern Europeans are as much as 80% "basal Eurasian/EEF " , lol! Both WHG and ANE are African also because it was found in Natufians according to the reply . I can't remember if it is true or not. In AFRICA ANE is high in San ding! Ding! this is not rocket science to see what happened here. Maybe Cass will help me get my hands on Dart book "Hong Kong man in stone age south Africa. everything is aligning now [QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [qb] T-Rex posted this and no one bit. SMH. Sarkoborosis here admitting “basal Eurasian” is African. He is admitting Europeans are a subset of Africans. And no one got that?! BS!!! @ “I doubt it’s **entirely** the former” Quote “I agree that “Middle Eastern” is ambiguous, and it’ll be important to parse this more carefully. [b]How much of this is “Basal Eurasian”[/b] (which may have had a very long tenure in North Africa and perhaps [b]even diverged from “African” lineages while still geographically within the continent) [/b]and how much is specifically West Eurasian? [b]I doubt it’s entirely the former.[/b] Since even Natufian foragers ~12ka had substantial West European hunter-gatherer-related ancestry, I would not be surprised to find it in the earliest Dynastic Egyptians.” [/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3