...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptians DNA is Less Sub Saharan than modern Egyptian DNA.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] Dummy. Read the Lazaridis papers. ALL THREE OF THEM!! Read Matheisen et al also and many papers within the last 3-4 years. Read Rosenberg from 2002. This is not a secret. The Lazaridis paper was co-authored by over 100 well know geneticist. YES, 100!!!!!!!!!! Not two or three. Over 100!!!!! It was a landmark paper. Fu probaly co-authored also. You don’t understand the Fu paper and the context. This is not bone-ology0 This hard science not susceptible to mis-interpretation,. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Cass/: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] Modern Europeans are as much as 80% "basal Eurasian/EEF " , lol! Both WHG and ANE are African also because it was found in Natufians according to the reply . I can't remember if it is true or not. In AFRICA ANE is high in San ding! Ding! this is not rocket science to see what happened here. Maybe Cass will help me get my hands on Dart book "Hong Kong man in stone age south Africa. everything is aligning now [/QUOTE]Where are the genetic studies showing modern Europeans are 80% near-eastern or African? This nonsense was already falsified by Fu et al. 2016 for Palaeolithic Europeans who from 37,000 - 14,000 BP "descended from a single founder population which forms part of the ancestry of present-day Europeans" with "no evidence of substantial genetic influx from elsewhere" i.e. recurrent, but restricted (minimal) gene flow. Fu et al do mention at roughly the start of the Holocene: "all European individuals analysed show an affinity to the Near East." That's great (no one has denied some Near East gene flow), but what is the figure of %. :confused: :confused: :confused: None provided as usual and this is irritating, and as I said the estimates range from 20 - 70%, and none of these studies are ever specific. The lower estimates do not contradict IBD, and note Fu et al also mention isolation-by-distance in relation to population structure and Near eastern ancestry in Europe: "a plausible alter-native is population structure, whereby Upper Palaeolithic Europe harboured multiple groups [i.e. a cline] that differed in their relationship to the Near East". [/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3