...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptians DNA is Less Sub Saharan than modern Egyptian DNA.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Elmaestro: Just reread the previous page... [URL=http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=009600;p=5#000244]Swenet[/URL], Why are you looking for YRI in these ancient genomes, isn't their a more significant SSA pop cluster that should be considered which you might be overlooking? [/QB][/QUOTE]Out of other available SSA groups (with the exception of Horners who already have substantial Basal Eurasian), the YRI are the closest to Natufians and several other ancient genomes. Like I said, I didn't post the Fst distance of other available SSA samples to Natufians because they're more than 0,2 (up to 0,255 in one Khoisan group), while YRI has at least a much better Fst of 0,186. I thought you already knew all of this from your extensive familiarity with the subject and the many papers you've read... [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [IMG]https://snag.gy/60Sq9L.jpg[/IMG] YRI outscored by almost all Eurasian samples in closeness to recently sampled Natufians. [b]Other available SSA samples score even worse, so I did not list them.[/b][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3