...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptians DNA is Less Sub Saharan than modern Egyptian DNA.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: "Basal Eurasian" is a theoretical concept that relates to some of the initial OOA populations over 40Kya _____________________________________________ [b]‘Basal Eurasians’[/b] are a lineage hypothesized to have split off before the differentiation of all other Eurasian lineages, including eastern non-African populations such as the Han Chinese, and even the early diverged lineage represented by the genome sequence of the ~45,000-year-old Upper Palaeolithic Siberian from Ust’-Ishim11 [b]West European Hunter-Gatherer (WHG),[/b] based on an 8,000 year-old genome from Loschbour, Luxembourg [b]- Ancient North Eurasian (ANE),[/b] based on a 24,000 year-old genome from South Siberia (dubbed Mal'ta boy or MA-1) [b]- Early European Farmer (EEF),[/b] based on a 7,500 year-old genome from Stuttgart, Germany, belonging to the Neolithic Linearbandkeramik (LBK) culture [b]- Eastern non-African (ENA),[/b] this basically means East Eurasian, and is based on samples of present-day Onge, Han Chinese and Atayal from Taiwan [/QUOTE][qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: Now again, how does a population of Africans who never left Africa and being isolated from another set of Africans become European before leaving Africa? Please explain. Divergence doesn't imply geographic migration. And it certainly doesn't imply the development and evolution of genes that only would have happened once said population actually migrated into Europe. For example, where is that precious Neanderthal DNA that is supposedly the marker for all Non Africans? Get my point? Those are still Africans, no matter if there was divergence among some population of Africans at some point in time within Africa. And again, how do you identify this said ancestral population before they left Africa? And how would you distinguish them from those who didn't leave even within the same divergent population? [/qb][/QUOTE]As I have shown the term EEF is not at issue. "EEF" is only 7,500 yo and is a population with ancestors who had been out of Africa for tens of thousands of years. The problem is the term "Basal Eurasian", part of the first people who leave Africa tens of thousands of years ago not 7K EEFs. and I agree with Doug on that term and have written about it before. It's misleading. They found no remains which they are calling Basal Eurasian. It's a theoretical term so it's confusing to use it along with terms like EEF which are based ion human remains. They should have called them maybe "Basal Eurasian Africans" or "African Pre-Eurasians" I'm not sure which is better but this would show that they were Africans. Try proceeding with your argument but use the different term and see how it sounds [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3