...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptians DNA is Less Sub Saharan than modern Egyptian DNA.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Fourty2Tribes: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by beyoku: Not quite. If the falling tree is defined on whether it is still standing then its pretty clear what happened. It really doesn't matter who is defining it if it is NOT an abstract and based on some clear MEASUREMENTS. [/QB][/QUOTE]Do you have a schematic of these measurements? Is it consistent over time? Is it competent? When does Mectoid begin and congoloid end, can someone be both negroid and Mediterranean? [IMG]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/02/17/article-1251731-028E41DF0000044D-657_306x327.jpg[/IMG] That was called a negroid head shape. But he has a narrow nose bridge by some standards so can he be Caucasoid or ehtiopoiod trump the headshape. [IMG]http://www.ancient-egypt.co.uk/manchester/images/manchester_museum_1099.jpg[/IMG] Caucasoid [IMG]http://www.ancient-egypt.co.uk/manchester/images/manchester_museum_1100.jpg[/IMG] Negroid If I am trying to blackwash that skull I look at the head alone and say look... [IMG]http://i51.tinypic.com/14bi91v.jpg[/IMG] Negroid. If I'm spoofing white people I would say "typically negroid in its measurements" and maybe throw in some big words and names of bones. The same would be true with prognathism. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3