...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptians DNA is Less Sub Saharan than modern Egyptian DNA.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] Posted to Davidski Xyyman: “So…where does that leave us? To the newbies reading this and is trying to follow what is going on and what the data means. The mtDNA disclosed by the “stolen” screen shots if true show that the AEians are closely related to Sub-Sahara Africans on the Eastern side. And where is Egypt? yes, you guessed it. The Eastern part of Africa. Where did the AEians tell us they originated? Yes, up the Nile. Upper Egypt. To the south. Geography will never fail you. The MTDNA is exactly where it should be. Now, SOME of you may remember your basics from High School biology. Birds and Bees and chromosomes etc. lol! Well yDNA remains unchanged from father to son unless there is a …well ….mutation or some hanky panky sneaking around affair thing was going on. …if you know what I mean. That also goes for the female line. Passed from mothers to daughter…and to sons but it stops there. So in other words. The matriarchal line was undoubtedly Sub-Saharan Africa and has absolute NO relation to modern Europeans and limited affiliation to Maghrebians . Now, Davidski chose to pin-point genome wide data as his “spin”. But anyone who did biology in school knows one does not get transmitted to the next generation without the other. Nice try David..ski!” [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3