...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptians DNA is Less Sub Saharan than modern Egyptian DNA.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Elmaestro: what you mean "M and N cant be modeled as SSA" ...in comparison to what? [b](they encompass all non Africans dude.)[/b][/QUOTE]You're contracting yourself. [i]And probably that, originally, [b]North Africans weren't a subset of SubSahran Africans.[/b][/i] —elMaestro How are North Africans not a subset of SSA, but Eurasians are? My point, which seems lost on you, is that it makes no sense to question me on why SSA ancestry can't serve as a proxy for North African ancestry when other non-SSA components (e.g. Eurasian) have the exact same properties. There is nothing special or remarkable about that to warrant turning it into a bombshell revelation that needs explaining. BTW, I literally have no idea what you're saying half of the time. Sometimes I pick up bits and pieces, like your support for Doug's and Clyde's claim that migration from the south invalidates the dichotomy between North African and SSA ancestry, but other times it's all jibberish to me. "Paralogous", "3D", "linear", the relevance of YRI, Khoisan and 80ky old BE. Very difficult to follow what you're saying. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3