...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptians DNA is Less Sub Saharan than modern Egyptian DNA.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] What? The orgy took place 400years ago? He! He! He! Of course it is NOT 400years ago. The rare African alleles in the non-Admixed British is too widespread. Their model is wrong. They also admit that the pattern do NOT fit [b]known[/b] models. I assumed your read the paper and missed the fact they are using [b]ONLY 10%[/b] of the rare alleles to make the “slave” comparison . SMH. What is up with you Capra? What about the [b]other 90%[/b] of the African rare allele found throughout Britain? You missed that didn’t you. Man! You Europeans! They also have [b]no[/b] REFERENCE African population. Either. Lol! That is why I own you Capra. You are too emotional. You are expending too much emotional energy. You need to look at the data and ignore your vested interest in [b]“trying to prove me wrong”[/b]. YOU CAN”T!!! [QUOTE]Originally posted by capra: [Q] [QUTE]Originally posted by xyyman: "We estimate that African populations contributed [b]approximately 1.2% of the UK gene pool [/b]and did so approximately[b] 400 years ago[/b]...." It is not really 400 years that would imply there was an orgy between Africans and the British 400years ago. eThat would mean most white women were having balck babies.[/QUOTE]lmao you accidentally typed in your PornHub search in place of math there. [/Q][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3