...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ish Gebor: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Cass/: [qb] @ Ish Gebor I posted prehistoric East African crania were not "Caucasoid" in 2014 (see below). In 2013 I used Leakey's (1935) erroneous dates. In 2014 I found a more recent source (Rightmire, 1984) to discover the Elmenteitan crania are Iron Age (2500 BP, not 7000 BP), later I found the same for Gamble's Cave (Ambrose, 1982). Unlike Afrocentrics I correct my mistakes. Tukuler though is still using the false dates, and as far as I am aware -so is Swenet, which is odd since he claims to have integrity when it comes to science. Of course, the fact no prehistoric East African crania have narrow nasal bones is a blow to their delusional "Caucasoids-r-us" fantasy. August, 2014: [QUOTE]Originally posted by cass: The supposed [Mesolithic]/Neolithic Kenyan skulls with 'narrow' features (e.g. Elmenteita A) from Bromhead's site, have been re-dated. They are only 2k years old. The 7000 BP date is from Leakey (1935) and Protsch (1978). Rightmire (1984) shows it is erroneous: [IMG]http://s16.postimg.org/kbpu1l9yt/Brom.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://s14.postimg.org/6xvoja7z5/Gambles_Cave.jpg[/IMG] Bromshead [Elmenteitan] is only 2500 - 2000 BP.[/QUOTE]The 8000 BP estimate for Gamble's Cave is also questioned by Rightmire (hence the "?" on the table) and falsified by Ambrose (1982) who shows a carbon-dated layer [i]4 meters below[/i] the Gamble's Cave layer 12 provided the same age (!?), so obviously the date for the skulls is a lot more recent than the deeper layer; no older than 3000 BP as estimated by Ambrose. [/qb][/QUOTE]Euroloon, I am talking about something specific, you posted years ago on Central Africa. Yet, you keep babbling about East Africa and Elmenteita. Beside that Elmenteita show great similarities with the HK43 Burial, which belongs to the first mummies. [IMG]http://www.hierakonpolis-online.org/images/assets/pd_cemeteries/hk43_wrapped_burial.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.hierakonpolis-online.org/images/assets/pd_cemeteries/hk43_burial_450.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.hierakonpolis-online.org/images/assets/pd_cemeteries/hk43_b333_hair.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://archive.archaeology.org/online/features/hierakonpolis/jpegs/zombies5a.jpg[/IMG] A cave with a few specimen isn't that well defined, I hope you can agree on this. So what I am saying essentially its that the Elmenteita are not and can't be representative for an overall in that region. [IMG]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/18/ROM-Ber3.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b7/ROM-Eth1.jpg[/IMG] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3