...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian DNA from 1300BC to 426 AD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [QB] Your miniFiler STR profile popSTR global (Old World ) results slightly favor Africa over E Asia. Your complete profile is in Africa, E Asia, CS Asia, Europe, and the Levant. PopSTR indicates Kenya BaNtu have the highest frequency for four of your alleles and one locus. Biaka is your popSTR 2nd place holder. Upper Egypt & Mzab get the bronze. Sudan & Somali show but Yoruba is nondescript. It just has the profile without any of it's alleles in the hi-freq zone like the above. Mbuti, Mandenka, and S Afr BaNtu didn't have all 16 alleles though they have some hi-freq alleles, even some hi-freq loci. San were actually missing three whole loci. They total 8 missing alleles from your profile. DNAtribes jumped on your Biaka-like locale? Popaffiliator on your Upper Egypt & 'Mzab-proxy'? [QUOTE]Originally posted by Fourty2Tribes: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: Well, you probably got some Amazigh up in you. So stuff your allele values in that popSTR PM I sent ya and let's see. Popaffiliator 5 region is only 65% accurate. [/QUOTE] http://cracs.fc.up.pt/~nf/popaffiliator/str_db.html Bias database. One country in Europe has more samples than all of Africa. Nationalgeographic does the same to a lesser extent. Popaffiliator would probably do the same with most Americans. Thats why I said Dnatribes MLI score FTW. It predicted that I was an American from West Africa. Popaffiliator thinks I'm a Moor. Hmmm, Mike might appreciate that. [/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3