...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Beja of Sudan: an intermediate position between Africans and non-Africans 2014
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] ^No. All Africans are closely related to each other. If they even have one smidgen of decreased distance to Eurasians, it either means that the powers that be were racist, Or it means that their outlier status is due to Eurasian ancestry. This is why we reject the term SSA, as well as the dichotomy between SSA ancestry and Basal Eurasian (Basal Eurasian is SSA ancestry, but masked out). We don't want to create the impression that some forms of African ancestry can be closer to Eurasians. And even if that's true, we should ignore it. Just like we've ignored Keita's conclusions all this time when he spoke on change over time in Egypt. Well, we didn't ignore it, but we just relegated all change to late dynastic Lower Egypt. Even though we're secretly familiar with Keita's work, our official position in public is that Upper Egypt changed, but not until the Arab invasion. See Pagani 2012. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3