...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Egyptian DNA, Forumbiodiversity, sub-Saharan Africa
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by .Charlie Bass.: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [qb] You and your fellow turds are talking on bought time. You are already done. Your position has been thrashed by data for a long time. And it's about to be thrashed even more by the Abusir mummies. You just think you have a point. [/qb][/QUOTE]I already stated my position and stand by it, that ancient Egyptians were Africans most akin to Saharans and Upper Nile valley peoples. A set of mummies from the damn 3rd intermediate Period, a time when most of the dynasties were of Libyan origin, isn't going to refute that position. The Abusir mummies won't say jack about predynastic and Early Dynastic Egyptians, so pound your chest all you want retard, trying to bash the so called Afrocentrist with your strawmen arguments isn't going to win. [/qb][/QUOTE]Typical Egyptturd comeback. You keep talking about late dynastic Egypt being late in time and admixed, but won't mention that late dynastic Egyptians are still closer to predynastic Egyptians (all things considered) than either is to Sub-Saharan Africans. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3