...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Egyptian DNA, Forumbiodiversity, sub-Saharan Africa
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BlessedbyHorus: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by beyoku: [qb] Never said anything about "West Africa". As explained Before: North Africa is not ONE thing. Sub Saharan Africa is not ONE thing... they both consist of different heterogenous genetic components with different genetic histories. You making that complaint is like a Euroclown objecting to "Sub Saharan" ancestry in X population Eurasians because "you shoulda said East African or Hadza".......never mind the fact that those two ancestries are SSA. You playing games man. So now that you know what North African is........are their North African genetic admixtures in HOA, Hema, Tutsi et al? Some time ago I objected to the idea of Berber like admixure in Fulani.l. I argued they have no M81/H/U6........multiple studies shows the huge autosomal component. I couldn't ignore it after seeing further studies and personal results of Fulani far and wide. AFAIAK iALL the data already EXISTS. There is no need for a "wait and see" approach when dealing with the biological affinity of MODERN human populations. [/qb][/QUOTE]Not trying to attack Charlie Bass(trust me I'm not), but wasn't there a GIANT ass discussion on FOrumbiodiversity on the North African Berber admixture in narrow featured Africans like the Fulanis? I mean he is a member of FBD for a long time and should have seen the discussion. This shouldn't be anything new. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3