...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Egyptian DNA, Forumbiodiversity, sub-Saharan Africa
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by .Charlie Bass.: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [qb] Lol. I'm going to let people decide for themselves whether you're lying and simply don't want accountability for your political agenda. No need for me to keep pointing out the sneaky games you play whenever you try to disown your previous comments. Of course you're going to deny, disown, and flip flop; you realize how profoundly stupid your attempts were to use non-representative samples as stand ins. No doubt you will try it again when you think no one is looking. But make no mistake about it. We know why you insisted on using the Toubou sample as a stand in. You are very calculated and deliberate with your duplicitous games. The North African ancestry Toubou have is influencing their craniofacial position, which you thought made them an excellent pawn in your word games. [QUOTE]The [b]morphology of some Tubu Crania was fully biologically sub-Saharan. Others displayed combinations of biologically sub-Saharan and North African expressions of the scored traits.[/b] The Kanembu and Kanuri specimens [b]were characterised by a similar degree of variability.[/b] The presence of individuals with more or less pronounced biologically sub-Saharan or North African morphological characteristics in these prehistoric and modern comparative samples [b]was assumed to simply reflect the composition of the populations they were drawn from. The Tubu, for instance, can be described as a predominantly biologically sub-Saharan population with varying amounts of biologically North African admixture[/b] (see I.D.2.d. and for example: Charpin 1961; Fuchs 1961, 1978; Hassanein Bey 1924; Nachtigal 1879: 420-464; Peel 1942; Thesiger 1939). Consequently, that the Tubu Crania were morphologically quite varied was not at all unexpected. [b]The same was true for the inspected Kanembu, Kanuri and A-Group specimens (see I.D.1.a.3. and I.D.2.d.).[/b] [/QUOTE]—Becker 2011 Too bad for you I'm not one of your friends on Zetaboards who buys into your bs. [/qb][/QUOTE]Elongated African traits, if they are talking abut those traits, are just as sub-Saharan, but when they say sub-Saharan in most studies they mean stereotypically Broad trend Africans. Rightmire ran into this problem East African crania. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3