...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Egyptian DNA, Forumbiodiversity, sub-Saharan Africa
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by capra: [QB] Only Luxmanda_3100BP and South_Africa_1200BP were modelled with PPNB ancestry. None of the ancient Malawians had anything of the kind. Indeed we don't have super-ancient DNA that would allows to draw any firm conclusions about the deep prehistory of Africa. Well, feel free to ignore everything that is said about it. But now we have [i]recent[/i] DNA from Africa, so maybe now we can talk about the Bantu expansion, East-South Africa cline, Northeast African pastoralist migrations, which we now have data for? Can't you ever discuss AFRICA without continually making it all about Eurasians? In this case the study used the [i]Tanzanian[/i] Luxmanda_3100BP as their reference whenever possible and explicitly note that the ancestry they model as PPNB could be shared ancestry of African origin. So there is [i]nothing[/i] in this paper that requires actual Eurasian ancestry in the ancient samples. Now are you even capable of discussing Africa, do you know anything about it at all? All I ever see from you is vague wishful thinking full of errors. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3