...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] I haven’t read the paper as yet but I speculated they would use a distant “SSA” like MButi but they used another distant SSA like YRI. They would not or could not possible use closer SSA, why, it will screw with their hypothesis. Understand the games. Of course M1 is African and found in SSA West and East and North of the Sahara. Regardless 15% YRI is high!! [QUOTE]Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Ish Gebor: [qb] Capra , Thanks for posting. For the members. Let's stay objective and critical. [/qb][/QUOTE]Naturally distant West African Yoruba are the designated "sub-Saharan" comparison group. Of interest would be the breakdown of their ancient samples- dating and locations- they all seem rather recent- quote: [i]"According to the radiocarbon dates (Supplementary Data 1, see also ref. 18), the samples can be grouped into three time periods: Pre-Ptolemaic (New Kingdom, Third Intermediate Period and Late Period), Ptolemaic and Roman Period."[/i] The ancient data sample is also drawn from the north- Lower Egypt- where there has long been more outside admixture. Hard to read more on tiny phone screen but will check out later in more detail. [/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3