...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [qb] reviewer 5"It is indeed questionable how accurate ancient admixture rates can be learned from either a single locus (mtDNA) or just three samples in a case in which admixture is so recent that ancestry blocks are necessarily large and the variation in admixture rates between individuals expected to be very high. However, the authors are aware and transparent about these shortcomings in their data. According to the peer review response the author is arguing for E1b1b1 as non-African. GTFOH! [/qb][/QUOTE]Anything from the Max Plank Institute and written by David Reich is suspect. These researchers are firmly interested in maintaining the status quo and the Hamitic myth. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3