...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] Lol. Like calling this site Egyptturds.com indicates a desire for disciples. :rolleyes: Angel only described AE and AE/North African-mixed populations as [b]more negroid[/b] versions of essentially non-SSA populations. Hence, he talks about a negroid early population in Egypt, but says they are "Mouillian" and "beyond A2". He says that Badarians are negroid but calls them B2. Inhabitants of his Jericho sample have Bushman-like features combined with a basically A4 foundation. So much for pretentious "I gotz the answers" reporting of Angel's work. Lol. Look at that pretentious title: Topic: What Angel really said about AE and early farmers http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=009652;p=1#000000 I let it slide all this time because it's entertaining to me how people can be so self-deluded and self-important about their fake news and absolutely convinced they have a point. Lol! He thought the Abusir mummies were Dinka and tried to accuse people of deliberately dodging him and this thread because of Dinka northern Egypt. Lol! Wait, wait. Let that simmer for a moment, please. He actually thought we were avoiding him and his Dinka northern Egypt. Lol. Talk about self-importance. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3