...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BlessedbyHorus: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: Nuff respect BBH I wish I got you good enough to see if I can paraphrase you right. [/QUOTE]I admit I could have worded what I was sating better. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: Admitting I'm not quite sure what all you mean, one critique if I may. Isn't 40k the cut off year for BE or did I mistake Tianyuan's significance? [/QUOTE]I was thinking early Neolithic with the spread of the subclades of E-M78 into the Near East. http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-RFDBC3MrhRc/TwSONGTqaEI/AAAAAAAAAKA/tx02k-dvLNs/s1600/E_Snp_Phylogeography.jpg Correct me if I am wrong. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: Not specifically addressing you but a little clarity and a plea for precision on this. Natufians aren't straight up African. They're hybrid from NE Afr and Levantine peoples that happened in the Levant. [/qb][/QUOTE]Why "hybrid?" Just asking because as far as I remember we did not get any in-depth admixture results for the Natufians showing their North African admixture. However, some hinted at it being mostly North African and also their paternal side was mostly E. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3