...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Elmaestro: [QB] @Swenet Yeah, Kinda...and no kinda. I'm saying that the HADZA could have retained a BE like precursor component. The combination of ancestral populations in Arabia could have been similar to that of the Hadza, a HG-Koi like signature and an archaic east African signature, dragged away by drift OOA. If there was indeed a population representative of BE it could have possibly been developed OOA in Isolate from other Eurasian groups, probably in Arabia/Iran which could simultaneously explain why Iran neolithic are closest to SSAs out of all Neolithic groups and have the most Basal Eurasian Ancestry. The Hadza in comparison to just about All Eurasians are extremely heterogeneous, which is why similarly to other San, and pygmy populations they form their own clusters early in ADMIXTURE. This relationship also explains why even though the Hadza received recent East African admixture, they score an incredibly positive F3 score. Hadza holds a basal position to both Mota AND Eurasians, the closest sample Ironically being HotuIII 60% basal Eurasian. [b]Edit:[/b] ^Which is why I asked that question you quoted. Cuz if BE was still in Africa until relatively recent, Ancient populations with commensurate levels of BE admixture would be much closer to SSAs. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3