...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by beyoku: [qb] Doug M: "Woe is me" [IMG]http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/small-violin.gif[/IMG] [/qb][/QUOTE]Dude. Give it a break. You claimed that your knowledge of "superior" science says that the AE were not "Sub Saharan". OK. Then what were they if they were not Sub Saharan? If there is no "non SSA" ancient African lineage you can point out then what would they be but Eurasian back migrants? Otherwise they would be some sort of so-called "sub saharan" based on how science defines mtDNA lineages..... But see how you can't stand up when challenged and resort to diversionary tactics? Come on break down your supreme DNA knowledge on what DNA the AE "should" have had but isn't SSA and not Eurasian. Or to put it another way, if the Sahara was covering most of North Africa and therefore an extreme environment harboring few human populations then there are only two places later populations could come from: South of the Sahara or outside of Africa. What "other" choice is there and if there is one what DNA signature would that group carry (assuming they represent an ancient lineage of Africans that diverged from so-called "sub saharans" en-situ in North Africa separate from Eurasian back migrants). [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3