...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [qb] @Maestro [QUOTE]TreeMix infers that the Hadza are admixed between a Khoisan population (equally related to both the northwestern and southeastern Kalahari groups) [b]and a population most closely related to the Dinka[/b], with about 23±2% Khoisan-related ancestry] (Supplementary Fig. S20).[/QUOTE] https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms2140 However, on closer inspection it's not exactly 'Dinka'. It's closer to Eurasians than Dinka are to Eurasians, making it more similar to the position of Horners to Eurasians (but with little Eurasian):[/qb][/QUOTE]. [IMG]http://i68.tinypic.com/33adls3.gif[/IMG] I put a red dot on the E Afr branch where Hadza split from remaining E Afrs. I put a blue dot where E and W Eurasians split. I recolored the stretch in between them purple. Comments? Where along the purple bar would you (anybody reading this) place • the initial successful OoA migrants • any projected 'Basal Eurasians'? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3