...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BlessedbyHorus: [QB] A good poster from Forumbiodiversity posted this. Tests on the Ancient Samples have been done. Here are their K6 scores. [b]JK2134[/b] 776-569 cal BC [QUOTE]0.00% Ancestral_S_Eurasian 0.00% East_Asian 25.22% Iran_Neolithic 61.91% Natufian 8.00% WHG 4.86% Sub_Saharan[/QUOTE][b]JK2911[/b] 769-560 cal BC [QUOTE]2.31% Ancestral_S_Eurasian 1.94% East_Asian 24.59% Iran_Neolithic 57.60% Natufian 6.64% WHG 6.93% Sub_Saharan[/QUOTE][b]JK2888[/b] 97-2 cal BC [QUOTE]0.00% Ancestral_S_Eurasian 0.01% East_Asian 35.25% Iran_Neolithic 54.16% Natufian 2.36% WHG 8.22% Sub_Saharan[/QUOTE]According to the poster the Ptolemaic era sample has the most SSA ancestry. While the other two have less in comparison. The Iran Neolithic admixture seems to be the second highest but is higher in the Ptolemaic era sample Thoughts? @Capra glad to see you're still here. :) [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3