...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by beyoku: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [qb] The point I m making is both Doug and Beyoku already have their minds made up and neither can hear the other nor want to hear the other (putting data and methodology aside, Doug has an intelligent analysis and is well grounded from a sociological (i.e., university field Afrocentric) stance. AFAIHR no uniparental haplogroup is no guarantee of no [i]individual's[/i] phenotype. [/qb][/QUOTE]Just to be clear, my perspective on this issue goes back to the other thread where certain folks began claiming that folks should be "shaking in their boots" because of this paper. . [/qb][/QUOTE]Wall of text. SMH. The idea that this paper would be a "game changer" was based upon the teaser that would would have 91 autosomal genomes giving us a near 3000 year view of Egyptian history with the addition of modern samples. 91 nuclear genomes didn't come to fruition, we got 3........only three. There is not too much we can say based on three. I can say that analysis iof what we do have in terms of Eurasian ancient DNA still leaves much to be desired in the community and my criticisms there still stand. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3