...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by beyoku: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by BlessedbyHorus: [qb] Thanks for the response. [QUOTE]Originally posted by beyoku: [qb] @BlessedbyHorus - The colors may change at each K - SO In K=6/8 the widespread Mota/Hunter Gatherer component (Purple K group 2) is very small in Abusir. At K=8 Instead the have a very strong East African / Sudanese signature (Pink K group 5) at little under 40% At K=10 The purple is no longer diagnostic of Mota/HG, nor the pink of Sudanese. Instead the Mota/East Africa is grouped in an orange component (K Group 3) (about 13-15% in Abusir) Hunter gatherers differentiate into K component 10, totally absent Abusir. At K=12. These mummies show a strong East African / Hunter Gatherer signature that I have been describing as the [URL=http://www.forumbiodiversity.com/showthread.php?t=43417]"Hadza Effect"[/URL]. [/qb][/QUOTE]1. At K=10, if the purple is not Mota/HG then what is it? 2. At K=12. the yellow-like K=9 is East African? So according to this unofficial run the Abusir mummies are significantly East African? And I've seen your Hadza theory before in that thread on FBD. 3. Was I on point about the Natufians? [/qb][/QUOTE]It looks to be a West Asian component that spread with European Farmers. NOt "European Famers" bu the Near Eastern/Anatolian folks that spread Farming into Europe. Also at K=10 Natufian have large chunk of North East African Pink. Kep in mind somtimes that clusters are just the computer doing its thing and are not based on REAL demographic events. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3