...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] I am chilling out. I am posting for the more intelligent readers who want to get in on this. They now have access to the BAM files and can do their own analysis. Maybe one day I will get the time and that to really get into this. The information is out there. My bad! I will not use your name again. I wasn't posting to you. Some of you know I target a bigger audience. But if you look at Suppl FIG3 you will see why your effort is futile. The Abusir mummies are Africans. Modern Tunisians and Modern Egyptians are the closest of the populations they used ....based upon autosomal SNP. As you know Tunisians has the least amount of "European" ancestry of North Africans but carry a high frequency of "Eurasian" mtDNA. The four closest to Abusir are Tunisans, Modern Egyptians, Yemenis and Bedoiun!!! All heavily Africanized. Great Lakes weren't included. Keep in mind Lazardis(2014) could not disentangle YRI from "Basal Eurasians" and therefore used Bedouins as a proxy. In 2017 he came back and admitted Basal Eurasian/Natufians had a "recent" African origin. Nah! Abusir are Africans. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3