...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Lower Egyptian Levanite(?) influence dates 2,000 BC
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by sudaniya: [QB] Doug Oshun has comprehensively answered your ill-fitting Rome appeal and why it is evidently not equivalent or comparable. I'm sorry to say, but you're going around in circles - like a dog chasing its own tail. Your assertions cannot hope to stand against 90 mtdna samples and 3 autosomal samples and the picture they paint for Northern Egypt. Northern Egypt [at that time] was clearly Eurasian - as demonstrated by these 90 samples. Now, it goes without saying that we need samples from Luxor, Aswan, Edfu, Kom Ombo and Esna to get a conclusive and comprehensive picture of ancient Egypt's biological affinities - especially from the early dynastic period. @the rest of the forum At the heels of this regional specific study, some people have already concluded that ethnic black ancient Egyptians did not exist -> that there was no such thing... so I would like to ask them if they believe that the Naqadans and Badarians were Eurasian and not at all intimated with Lower "Nubians" and Northern Sudanese. We know that the Badarians and Naqadans are regarded as representative of dynastic Egyptians, and so I wonder how these results meld with that. People who now accept that ancient Egypt was a Levantine transplant will have to argue that these neolithic and predynastic cultures were actually south Levantine transplants and not African - as we believed earlier. People will have to furnish this Levantine transplant assertion with archaelogical and anthropological evidence. Ancient Egypt was 5000 years old, and so the idea that these regional specific results are representative of all of geographic ancient Egypt from the beginning to the end is incredibly silly. Alt-right groups are pointing to what they see as unsettling demographic shifts within the United States, and the United States is not even three [3] centuries old, so that should give people an opportunity to arrive at a more nuanced conclusion when the demographic changes that occur over thousand of years are duly taken into consideration. I'm not going to now act as though the people in Luxor and Aswan were not the majority in ancient Egypt and that people like Narmer, Thutmose II, Senusret I, Huni, Teti, Pepi II, Akhenaten, Amenhotep II, Mentuhotep II, Sahure, Djoser, Ahmose I, Queen Tiye and many more never existed... ..Or that black Egyptians (ancient and modern) are just fiction. I will concede when similar results are provided from southern samples. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3